About twelve years later it was cool again. With The Rock, Stone Cold, and the redubbed 'WWE sports entertainment', it was as if Vince McMahon finally woke up, and realized all those little Hulkamaniacs were now in their twenties, so he adjusted -- instead of Hulk Hogan's prayers and vitamins, there was Steve Austin's cooler of beer. I don't remember how I got back into it, but once I was I watched it loyally -- this is like 2000-01, and I was recording the shows on VHS, (pre-DVR), because I worked nights. As this was the beginning of the internet, I became something of a student of wrestling, I found the Wrestling Observer newsletter, and in particular when Meltzer would do ten thousand words on some forgotten wrestler's work in some extinct backwater territory, I'd reread it over and over, trying to catch up on the fragmented, fascinating history of pro wrestling from legit to fixed sport.
The WWE in 2001, while often described as a male soap opera, was more like live improvisational theater built over the framework of athletic competition. With the last competition of Vince McMahon's career, that being the Monday Night Wars against the Ted Turner-owned WCW, radicalizing the gimmicks and stories both companies tried; with the internet birthing the generation, (my generation), of smart marks, a growing percentage of wrestling fans clued in on how wrestling worked, how the winners and losers were decided, and thus changed how we judged the content the companies provided; with a new generation of performers learning to interact with smartened-up live audiences; all of these things made for a mutated product: the '98-'02 era of WWE RAW was the first meta-television show. As it informed on itself, it reached a peak of popularity.
And then one day I moved from one state to another, and like when I was a kid, I left the wrestling behind. The last big show I watched is of some interest, it was the main event of Summerslam 2002, a match for the Unified WWE World Championship, a match where I knew the ending prior to watching. It was simple really: The Rock was the champ, he had already been part-time for a year while filming movies, and it was known he was breaking from the WWE to pursue acting full time, this would, in effect, be his retirement match. His opponent was this young phenom with a rocket strapped to his back, (anyone betting on who was going to be the biggest wrestling star of the next decade would have bet on this wrestler over anyone). His name is Brock Lesnar. I knew Rock was gone, and Brock was the next guy, and paid money to watch a match I already knew the end to. Because it was about how Rock would lose to Lesnar. How the torch-passing story would be told. Dwayne Johnson lost clean, and, while Brock Lesnar would be a star no matter what, it helped to win the big belt by beating the big star without cheating, or any of the usual pro wrestling shenanigans. It was a nice goodbye. But this idea, that I knew the finish of the match, yet wanted to watch the story of the match out of curiosity of it's narrative quality, is the difference between the nine year old and the twenty-one year old. But without loving it as a nine year old, one can't see it this way, that wrestling fans judge the performers as actor-directors, the matches their stories. Once you understand this, you understand the aesthetic; the nine year old liked Hulk Hogan; the twenty-one year old looked back, and preferred Ric Flair.
That Rock/Brock match is of some extra interest as Johnson and Lesnar became massive draws outside of wrestling, Rock as a movie action hero, and Lesnar as an Ultimate Fighting Champion; the two biggest American wrestling stars outside of wrestling ever.
And ten years later, both have come back to wrestling. Rock is a rare thing, because every old wrestler ends up coming back, and telling the fans it is because they "love the business", which means they've failed outside of wrestling, and are back for the old paycheck, (I'm looking at you, Hulkster), whereas the Rock really did come back out of love of the game, because he's from a family of wrestlers, and his window of ever doing it again was closing, (his acting career has never been hotter). Lesnar on the other hand, came back because he had to quit real combat fighting, and WWE gave him the Godfather offer. They both came back to feud with the biggest stars in the WWE, names like John Cena and CM Punk. And there is the distant possibility of a Rock/Brock rematch, over a decade later, probably at Wrestlemania. How do I know this? Because I was sitting in a motel last year, on a Monday night, and tuned in. Sure enough, I was pulled back in. In 2012 I might have watched ten shows, but I followed it a bit on the internet, and then I subscribed once again to the Wrestling Observer site, (while once I was mailed a newsletter every week, now its digital newsletters, and podcasts), and slowly, surely, here I am, in 2013, DVR'ing wrestling, following the dumb stories, taking stock of the new performers, buying in behind some of them as stars on the come-up. Maybe my off-generation habit of returning to wrestling will hit again this time, because despite the corny tasteless part of the WWE, there is a lot of fun stuff happening:
0 comments:
Post a Comment